The Citadel's Home PageDescription and PlansCompliance CertificationQuality Enhancement PlanReference DocumentsWork in ProgressThe Citadel's Reaffirmation 2004 Home Page

Description and Plans

 

Introduction

Every ten years, all accredited colleges in the southern states are required to renew their status by demonstrating that they continue to meet the accreditation standards of the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools. In 2001, the process leading to reaccreditation (for years referred to as a self study) underwent such a significant change in philosophy and format that it is now called a reaffirmation. Reaffirmation requires completion of two significant projects—the compliance audit and the quality improvement plan—which The Citadel is now engaged in and will complete in 2004.

This site is part of that undertaking and is intended,
   • first, as a resource for Citadel faculty and staff preparing for reaffirmation;
   • second, as a reference point for members of the SACS Staff and the two peer review teams as they guide us through the process; and
   • finally, as a comprehensive picture of The Citadel for other persons who may be interested.

This site is maintained by Professor Robert A. White, Department of English. Please contact him by phone (843-953-2734) or e-mail (whiter@citadel.edu) with questions or comments.

 


Organization and Overview of this Site

This site is divided into five main sections:

Description and Plans: The purpose and philosophy of the reaffirmation process, the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools, The Citadel's Leadership Team, and information about this site.
The Compliance Certification:

The Citadel's responses to
   • the twelve Core Requirements,
   • the fifty-three Comprehensive Standards, and
   • the eight Federal Mandates
that together comprise the compliance certification.

The Quality Enhancement Plan: The Citadel's course of action for improving the quality of the institution, with special attention to student learning.
Referenced Documents: A hyperlinked list of the documents most commonly referred to throughout the audit. (Not a comprehensive list.)
Work in Progress: A password-protected area for use by faculty and staff working on the reaffirmation, intended for sharing draft copies of responses and other information.

About SACS

The Southern Association of Colleges and Schools is the accrediting body for more than 12,000 public and private educational institutions, from prekindergarten through university level, in eleven states of the Southeastern U.S. and in Latin America. Member institutions regularly perform comprehensive self-evaluations to assist them in planning for improvement and to assure the public of their overall quality. SACS is one of only six such regional accrediting organizations in the U.S. recognized by the U.S. Department of Education. Member institutions are accredited through one of SACS' three commissions:   the Commission on Colleges, the Commission on Secondary and Middle Schools, and the Commission on Elementary and Middle Schools. In preparing for reaffirmation, The Citadel works with and through SACS's Commission on Colleges, the representative body of the College Delegate Assembly, which is charged with carrying out the accreditation process.

 

Rationale for Reaffirmation

The SACS Reaffirmation Process serves three important purposes. In the first place, the compliance audit gives us the opportunity to check up on ourselves—to pause and ask ourselves "How are we doing?" We are, and always have been, strongly committed to giving our students the best possible education of its kind, and our enviable reputation in this area speaks for itself; but no institution can afford complacency. The fact that we periodically examine the effectiveness of our programs and the use of our resources assures present and future generations of students that they will receive at least as much from The Citadel as did their parents.

In the second place, formulating and implementing a quality improvement plan (QEP) guarantees that The Citadel actively seeks out creative and comprehensive ways to improve student learning, no matter how effective current practices might be. While the compliance audit forces us to ask how effective our present methods are, the QEP raises possibilities for renewal that challenge us to become even better.

Finally, the reaffirmation process, and the SACS reaccreditation that will follow it, demonstrate—to prospective students, parents, legislators, the armed services, and the general public—that The Citadel is indeed fulfilling its mission. It is therefore an absolutely essential feature of our standing within, and our contribution to, the nation's educational system.

 

The Citadel's Reaffirmation Leadership Team

  • Major General John S. Grinalds, President, Chair
  • Brigadier General Harrison S. Carter, Provost and Dean of the College, Vice Chair
  • Colonel Curtice E. Holland, Vice President for Finance and Business Affairs
  • Mrs. Alicia Loeffler, Staff Assistant
  • Brigadier General J. Emory Mace, Commandant of Cadets
  • Mrs. Patricia P. McArver, Vice President for Communications
  • Colonel Isaac S. Metts, Jr., Associate Vice President for Academic Affairs
  • Colonel Laurence W. Moreland, Professor and Head, Department of Political Science and Criminal Justice, and Chair, Strategic Planning Committee
  • Mr. Leslie G. Robinson, Director of Athletics
  • Colonel Dudley Saleeby, Jr., Chair, Strategic Planning Committee, Board of Visitors
  • Mr. Frank A. Shannon, III, Executive Director, Citadel Foundation
  • Colonel Donald M. Tomasik, Vice President for Facilities and Engineering
  • Colonel Robert A. White, Professor, Department of English
  • Lieutenant Colonel George T. Williams, Professor, School of Education, and Chair, Faculty Council

 

Calendar:

May 23, 2002:
Orientation meeting for institutions with undergraduate and graduate programs or only graduate programs.
November 15, 2002:
Institutional Fall Annual Profile due.
April 6-7, 2003:
Staff Advisory Visit to the campus.
April 2003:
Institutional Winter Annual Profile Due. (Expanded version.)
August 15, 2003:
Submission of Compliance Certification and documentation.

September 29 through
October 2, 2003:

Off-Site Peer Review Committees meet to conduct preliminary assessments of institutional compliance with the Principles of Accreditation.
October 2003:
Staff conference calls with leadership teams to convey preliminary findings determined by the Off-Site Peer Review Committee.
November 17, 2003:

Institutional Fall Annual Profile due.

January 12, 2004:
Submission of Quality Enhancement Plan.
April 2004:
Institutional Winter Annual Profile due.
March 15 through
April 30, 2004:
On-Site review and preparation of Reaffirmation Committee Reports.
Five months after
on-site review:
Institutional response to the report of the Reaffirmation Committee due
December 2004:
Review by the Commission on Colleges to determine reaffirmation of accreditation.